Electrical and Computer Engineering Department
WPI MQP Outcomes Data Sheet
To be completed by sponsors of ECE MQPs at the end of their project

I. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION

MQP Code:
Note: the MQP code might have been provided to you from the faculty advisor. If you do not have it readily available, please enter your name and the advisor's name.
Was this project finished by B01 (December 2001)? Yes No
If no: When do you think/know it was/will be finished?
Skip to the bottom of this page and submit the form now.

A note on how your responses will be used: Your responses to the questions here will be emailed to Prof. Nicoletti. She will be comparing responses obtained from advisors, students, and project sponsors -- and the biennial MQP review committee -- and sharing the results with the ECE faculty as part of our assessment program.

Please indicate your preferences for how the data will be used:
Yes I want the data to be made available to my project's advisor(s), or
No I do not want the data to be made available to my project's advisors -- I want it to be reported as part of the general statistics only
Making the information available to your project advisor(s) will be helpful for their continuing development of projects and project advising -- but if you are concerned about anonymity, check "no".

II. SPECIFIC PROJECT OUTCOMES

You are now asked to make TWO assessments, First, please indicate the extent to which each of the following possible outcomes was an aspect (or should have been an aspect) of the project due to the nature of the topic, on a scale of
0 not at all
1 to a minimal extent
2 somewhat
3 to a significant extent
4 to a very large extent

Then, for any outcome that was an aspect of the project to a significant (3) or very large (4) extent, assess the level of accomplishment that the students demonstrated in this area, on a scale of

0 did not complete the work for this criterion, or demonstrated severe misconcepti ons about the important concepts; made many critical errors
1 displayed an incomplete understanding of the important concepts and had some not able misconceptions; made a number of errors when performing important strategie s or skills but completed a rough approximation of them
2 applied strategy or concepts without significant errors
3 demonstrated a complete and accurate understanding of the important concepts
4 application of strategy or concept displayed originality or excellence that exceeded expectations


  Only if extent is 3 or 4
Quality Extent
(0 to 4)		 Level
(0 to 4)
1. Ability to apply mathematics, science and engineering
2. Ability to apply mathematics specifically
3. Ability to design and conduct experiments
4. Ability to analyze and interpret the resulting data
5. Identify, Formulate, and Solve Engineering Problems
6. Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet design criteria
7. Ability to use modern engineering tools for engineering design and analysis
8. Ability to communicate effectively verbally
9. Ability to communicate effectively in writing
10. Incorporate Economic Considerations
11. Incorporate Safety Considerations
12. Incorporate Reliability Considerations
13. Incorporate Aesthetic Considerations
14. Perform Analysis
15. Perform Synthesis
16. Use and Develop Creativity
17. Ability to function within a multidisciplinary team
18. Understand Professional and Ethical Responsibility
19. Understand Impact of Work in Global, Societal Contexts
20. An appreciation for and the skills to accomplish life-long learning
21. Demonstrate Knowledge of Contemporary Issues
22. Ability to use resource materials

III. COMMENTS

Please make any comments you wish to make about the strengths or weaknesses of this project here: