Electrical and Computer Engineering Department
WPI MQP Outcomes Data Sheet
To be completed by ECE MQP Reviewers

Your responses to the questions here will be emailed to Prof. Nicoletti.

I. GENERAL PROJECT INFORMATION

Note: please use lower case letters and a hyphen. For example, dwn-0020.
Your three-letter code:
MQP Code:
Title:
When was this project finished:
Main Advisor:
Co-Advisor(s):
What subareas within ECE were involved with this MQP? Check all that apply (although most MQPs are limited to one, two or three subareas)
Aerospace Analog Electronics Computer Engineering Controls Electricity & Magnetism
Power Signals and Communications Software Solid State Other
If other, please explain

II. SPECIFIC PROJECT OUTCOMES

You are now asked to make TWO assessments, First, please indicate the extent to which each of the following possible outcomes was an aspect (or could have been an aspect) of the project due to the nature of the topic, on a scale of
0 not at all
1 to a minimal extent
2 somewhat
3 to a significant extent
4 to a very large extent

Then, for any outcome that was an aspect of the project to a significant (3) or very large (4) extent, assess the level of accomplishment that the student(s) demonstrated in this area, on a scale of

0 did not complete the work for this criterion, or demonstrated severe misconceptions about the important concepts; made many critical errors
1 displayed an incomplete understanding of the important concepts and had some notable misconceptions; made a number of errors when performing important strategies or skills but completed a rough approximation of them
2 applied strategy or concepts without significant errors
3 demonstrated a complete and accurate understanding of the important concepts
4 application of strategy or concept displayed originality or excellence that exceeded expectations
Quality (for information on what a term means, click on the term) Extent
(0 to 4)		 Level
(0 to 4)
1. Ability to apply mathematics, science and engineering
2. Ability to apply mathematics specifically
3. Ability to design and conduct experiments
4. Ability to analyze and interpret the resulting data
5. Identify, Formulate, and Solve Engineering Problems
6. Ability to design a system, component, or process to meet design criteria
7. Ability to use modern engineering tools for engineering design and analysis
8. Ability to communicate effectively verbally
9. Ability to communicate effectively in writing
10. Incorporate Economic Considerations
11. Incorporate Safety Considerations
12. Incorporate Reliability Considerations
13. Incorporate Aesthetic Considerations
14. Perform Analysis
15. Perform Synthesis
16. Use and Develop Creativity
17. Ability to function within a multidisciplinary team
18. Understand Professional and Ethical Responsibility
19. Understand Impact of Work in Global, Societal Contexts
20. An appreciation for and the skills to accomplish life-long learning
21. Demonstrate Knowledge of Contemporary Issues
22. Ability to use resource materials

III. ECE Data Gathering

Below are questions that have been asked in previous implementations of the MQP review.

1. ECE course level 1000 2000 3000 4000 grad
2. CS course level 1000 2000 3000 4000 grad
3. Math course level 1000 2000 3000 4000 grad

Amount in each category
4. Measurement/Analysis none little some much
5. Hardware Design none little some much
6. Software Design none little some much
7. Computer Simulation none little some much
8. Other Comp none little some much
9. Percentage Design/Analysis 100% design, 0% analysis 75% design, 25% analysis 50% design, 50% analysis 25% design, 75% analysis 0% design, 100% analysis
10. Capstone design content? Yes Uncertain No
11. Functional Project? Yes Uncertain No na
12. Worth 1 unit per student? Yes Marginal No
13. Quality of Abstract? Poor Marginal Fair Good Excellent
Documentation Topic Assessment
14. Goals/Specifications Yes Vague No
15. Design Yes Vague No
16. Test Yes Vague No
17. Performance Yes Vague No
18. Literature Yes Vague No
19. Implementation Yes Vague No
20. Economics Yes Vague No
21. Conclusions Yes Vague No
22. Executive Summary Yes Vague No

IV. COMMENTS

Please make comments you wish to make about the strengths or weaknesses of this project here, or any other comments you'd like passed along to the project advisor: